安全護欄抗沖擊能力分析
特種安全護欄是保障道路交通安全的重要設施,也是保衛(wèi)重要場所安全的第一道屏障。提高護欄的抗沖擊能力能夠有效減少交通事故中的財產(chǎn)損失,保護交通參與者的人身安全;同時也能夠更好的應對突發(fā)事件,將不安全因素阻隔在被保護目標之外。
(1)對護欄的抗沖擊性能進行了理論分析。利用無回彈型車輛與護欄碰撞簡化力學模型,推導出了最大橫向撞擊力計算公式,并按照設計的安全防護等級,對護欄結構的連接強度進行了校核。參照公路交通安全設施設計規(guī)范,計算了護欄的加權平均高度,分析了其抗大型車輛傾覆的能力。計算結果表明,護欄框架與半月柱之間采用5.8級及以上等級的M16螺栓連接能夠滿足A級防護的抗沖擊性能要求,且具有較高的安全系數(shù);護欄框架的焊接強度在理想狀態(tài)下剛好滿足A級防護的抗沖擊性能要求,但安全系數(shù)僅為1.17;護欄的加權平均高度為1.88 m,滿足A級抗大型車輛傾覆的防護等級要求。
(2)對護欄的抗沖擊性能進行了仿真分析。構建了“車輛—護欄”碰撞仿真模型,參照城市道路交通設施設計規(guī)范中規(guī)定的碰撞條件和實際應用中擬面對的正面撞擊極限工況進行了模擬仿真。仿真結果表明,在標準工況下,車輛與該新型特種安全護欄的碰撞過程中出現(xiàn)了“絆阻現(xiàn)象”;在正面撞擊極限工況下,該型護欄對車輛起到了有效的攔阻作用,但護欄框架被突破,出現(xiàn)了車輛穿越護欄的現(xiàn)象,因此該型護欄的抗沖擊性能仍有較大的提高空間。
(3)對護欄進行了水平靜力加載試驗。試驗由梁式和板式載荷分配器模擬小型車輛和大型車輛與護欄碰撞的接觸面,并通過螺旋千斤頂對護欄施加載荷力,觀測護欄的結構變形情況。試驗結果表明,護欄框架上下梁與框架邊柱焊接連接處為護欄結構的薄弱環(huán)節(jié)。若采取提高護欄框架連接強度的改進措施,則會使護欄結構充分利用其自身塑性變形吸收更多的碰撞沖擊能量,提高護欄的抗沖擊性能。
(4)提出了護欄結構優(yōu)化設計方案。以提高護欄框架焊接強度,避免或延緩護欄框架焊接處失效現(xiàn)象的發(fā)生為優(yōu)化目標,對護欄進行了增設加固角碼和提高底座凸臺高度的結構優(yōu)化改進,并對結構優(yōu)化后的護欄進行了抗沖擊性能仿真分析。結果表明,結構優(yōu)化后的護欄對沖擊能量的吸收提升了20.5%,且具備較好的多道布置攔停車輛的能力。
Thanks for sharing. I read many of your blog posts, cool, your blog is very good. https://accounts.binance.com/sl/register-person?ref=OMM3XK51
Your point of view caught my eye and was very interesting. Thanks. I have a question for you.
During ischemia reperfusion injury in mice, the gene for NGAL is significantly up regulated in the kidney, and the protein is overexpressed in distal tubule cells priligy dapoxetine amazon Tissue was prepared for cryosectioning as follows mouse heads were fixed overnight in 4 PFA at 4 C, equilibrated in 15 30 sucrose in PBS on ice for 3 hours or overnight depending on the stage, and placed in a solution with equal amounts of OCT and sucrose 30 sucrose at 4 C overnight
Principal Investigator William Gillanders, M buy priligy without a script Studies have compared the actual effect of different etiologies of cirrhosis on drug plasma levels and clearance of substances
Vida TIfrNZqWcWQeeVQQGb 6 18 2022 cost of cytotec for sale
Your point of view caught my eye and was very interesting. Thanks. I have a question for you.
Can you be more specific about the content of your article? After reading it, I still have some doubts. Hope you can help me.